Ram Promaster Forum banner

Ecoflow Wave 2 DC Heat Pump A/C Mode Test Results as Compared to a Toshiba 5000 BTU Window A/C & Portable A/C Discussion

13K views 27 replies 11 participants last post by  Stormin Norman  
#1 ·
I did quite a bit of testing over the summer of the Wave 2 that I purchased and thought people would be interested in the results. The short story is that out of the box, the bare bones $170 Toshiba is significantly more efficient in cooling capacity/power usage. Apologies for the long post, pulling in a lot of information from multiple posts made in other locations.

Background
The reason Ecoflow performs worse than its nameplate rating is because they use the ASHRAE BTU's which does not account for the heat generated by the unit being in the room (as opposed to outside with a window a/c), leakage through the ducts, and heat being radiated to the room from the ducts. The DOE recognized that portable a/c's have these limitations and started requiring manufacturers to run a new test with portable units to give an "equivalent" rating to the old test. If you look for portable a/c's you'll see two ratings now, ASHRAE and DOE SACC.

Unfortunately there's not a single way to compare the two numbers since there are so many things that effect the rating (insulation in the housing of the a/c, insulation of the ducting, single vs. dual ducts, air leakages, single vs. variable speed compressor, etc.). This page talks about the two systems and has some ranges of comparison: SACC BTU DOE vs ASHRAE in Portable AC - PICKHVAC

Using their ranges, it seems a proper de-rating can be anywhere from 50-85% to go from ASHRAE to DOE. Dual hose is the biggest differentiator, 75-83% de-rating per the website whereas single hose is 58-70%. We know the ecoflow isn't super well insulated and does have duct leakage problems, so a 75% de-rating seems appropriate, possibly even 70%.

That all boils down to the Wave 2 being equivalent to an ~3500-4000btu window unit but using the same amount of energy as a 5100 btu window unit. If you're not using both hoses it could be as bad as a 2500btu window unit.

What can we learn to improve cooling performance?
  1. Run the ecoflow outside of the space you're cooling if able (duct the conditioned air into a tent or other enclosed space)
  2. Seal the duct connections so that exterior air doesn't leak into your conditioned space
  3. If you can't run the unit outside, enclose it in an insulated box to minimize heat transfer into your conditioned space
  4. insulate your condenser ducts (the ones that go to the outside)
  5. If you can duct your conditioned air away from the intake of the ecoflow it will increase cooling performance (so that cold air isn't being sent back to be cooled again). The warmest air is sent to be cooled.
  6. exhaust ducts should be placed further apart than the provided attachment so that hot air isn't being sucked back in to the inlet.
  7. If exhaust ducts can't be separated, a baffle should be added to discourage air from being recirculated.

Test Setup & Unmodified Results
Over five days I compared the wave 2 and its standard modes (no modifications) against a 5000 btu Toshiba window unit that I had out in my garage. All tests were started at ~4pm and ran for one hour to try and get similar sun loadings across days. The garage door and back door were opened for ~30 minutes prior to each test to allow temperatures, thermal mass, and humidity in the garage to equalize to the exterior. The Toshiba has a slight advantage over the wave 2 for its test because I had previously built an insert with 2” of xps to match the window unit’s size. The Wave 2 only had 1” of xps and 1/8” sheets to finish closing the gap under the door. There was also some light rain ~20 minutes into the Toshiba’s test and my exterior thermometer got wet so there is some question in the final exterior temperature for that test only. The interior thermometer was unaffected. The garage is uninsulated (except for a couple panels on the door), and is ~2000 cu ft so definitely bigger than either a/c is intended for.

The Toshiba is rated for 4 amps at 115v AC (460w). I didn’t think to take power data during its test, but a separate 15 minute followup test using my delta mini showed that AC power draw was slowly ramping up to at least 400w. A longer test may have grown closer to the 460w rating. A short 5 minute test in low mode only used ~380w AC, but I don’t have any hour long cooling tests to look at temperatures in low mode.

In MAX mode, the wave 2 peaks at 470w DC. The wave 2 does do some aggressive throttling of the compressor during its operation in all modes. I believe it targets a delta temperature of ~18F between ambient and outlet temperatures in MAX mode. If the delta temp is >18F, it will ramp down the compressor, if it’s <18F it will ramp up the compressor. I didn’t record power data during the MAX mode test, but on a shorter 15 minute test MAX mode ranged from 440-470w DC. If you start getting closer to your set point I bet it would reduce further.

In ECO mode, the wave 2 cycles through a number of “modes” to save power. It starts with the compressor on high and low fan speed for 5 minutes. It ramps up over those 5 minutes to ~380w dc power draw. Then it switches to a low compressor and low fan speed for 15 minutes. In this mode it draws ~200w. Now comes the bad part, it runs on FAN ONLY for 10 minutes, only using ~10w. The cycle then repeats. I suspect that the same compressor limiting based on delta T could reduce the 5 minute high compressor numbers if you are near your set point. Overall, without compressor limiting, the ecoflow averages ~150w DC.

The issue with ECO mode is that the residual water in the base of the unit is re-added to the air during the fan only portions of the cycle. This is BAD for overall comfort. The RH in my garage actually INCREASED during the test which should definitely not be happening while an air conditioner is running. Perhaps a longer test would get to a better steady state and start to reduce humidity.

In sleep mode the aggressive throttling of the compressor actually made a difference in power consumption. The wave 2 targets a 20F (11C) delta t in this mode, and with the fan on such a low speed there’s significant mixing of the outlet/inlet air streams (and not enough mixing with the room air) so it ends up throttling the compressor down quite a bit. This has a significant effect on overall cooling ability of the room. At the start of the test the wave 2 was using ~250w DC, but within 20 minutes it dropped down to ~200w for nearly the remainder. Total energy use ~220w DC for the hour. I did run this test for an additional hour and room temperatures didn’t drop much further, but humidity levels did continue to drop (~1.5% RH/hr).

The last test, unmodified manual mode with high fan. The compressor throttling still occurred, targeting ~17.5F (~10C) delta t. I saw a max of 400w DC near the beginning of the test, dropping to 370w by the end. This is the most interesting test to me, because I got almost the same drop in temperature as my max mode test, but only used ~85% of the power. The difference may be due to different clouding on the two days (it’s a bit overcast and hazy today, I think it was only light clouds on the MAX mode day).
Image

Image

Image

Image


Improving Ecoflow Performance
The first thing to realize is that these hoses should be kept as short as possible, with as few bends as possible. The longer the hose, the greater the surface area that is available to transfer heat into the room you're trying to condition. Also, the more bends (and the tighter the bends) the more restricted the air flow is.

There's some research out there (Compression effects on pressure loss in flexible HVAC ducts (Journal Article) | OSTI.GOV) on flex ducts showing that they're pretty crappy for air flow over distances at the whole home HVAC scale (20 feet in length or so). A poorly installed flex duct can reduce your cfm by 50-75% or more! This is before taking into account bends in the ducting and is because the ridges in the duct create turbulence which restricts airflow.

Insulating the exhaust hose definitely helps, but it really depends on how long your hoses are running to the outside. Minimally, the provided hoses are one foot in length, for a total surface area of ~1.57sf. Over that amount of surface area, and with interior temperatures of 75F, the 110F air in the exhaust hose is adding about 95btu/hr of heat to the room. At the maximum hose length though (4.5 ft of hose extension and 7.07sf), that same 110F air can add ~412btu of heat to the room! That's cutting your performance by somewhere around 10% just because of the exhaust hose.

The intake hose from the outside hopefully isn't carrying 110F air, but even 85F outside air over 4.5ft of extension will add ~118btu of heat.

It's really surprising how little insulation is needed to make a big difference though. One inch of fiberglass insulation adds ~R3 which reduces the max length exhaust hose heat transfer to ~70 BTU/hr (and the intake to ~20btu). You hit diminishing returns very quickly though, R6 cuts you in half to ~35btu on the exhaust but is twice as thick of insulation.

Test Results With Ecoflow Mods
There are some inconsistencies in the test results here, notably that the baffle+manual high fan and baffle/exterior hose insulation performed worse than their non baffled counterparts. I'm not sure if that means that my baffle decreased performance (possible) or if the weather on those days effected the results. The starting temperature was significantly lower on the baffle days (~5F lower exterior temperatures), and the toshiba also performed worse on a repeat run at the end with similar lower exterior temperatures. Sun loading on the different days could also have effected things. I didn't take any sun/cloud measurements for any test, but pulling old weather data showed that every day was "fair" except the first Toshiba run which was "mostly cloudy" and the unmodifed sleep/unmodified manual high fan which were both "partly cloudy".
Image


Image



Overall thoughts:
  • I think ecoflow could eek more performance out of the wave 2 with some firmware updates. An advanced user mode that lets you set the target delta t between inlet/outlet would be awesome! You would use more power this way, but I think you’d gain performance. There may be some warranty killing hacks that could accomplish this.
  • Unmodified, the wave 2 is coming up short compared to a standard window AC.
  • I thought energy use might be better for the Wave 2 but was shocked at just how little draw my little window unit had. For some reason I thought it needed significantly more energy. Even accounting for inverter losses of 10%, you’re roughly even in power draw with the Wave 2 in MAX Mode but cooling better and at 1/5-1/10 the cost.
  • My original de-rating estimate of 70-75% for the ASHRAE to DOE SACC conversion on the wave 2 was right on the money. The Wave 2 performed at 71% of the capability of the window unit in MAX mode and used similar amounts of power after adding in inverter losses for the window unit.
  • One benefit of the wave 2 is how low it can throttle itself down and run its compressor. If you are in a well insulated or very small volume environment, or just trying to keep humidity levels down compared to exterior, it does seem like the wave 2 may be able to cool/heat for surprisingly low amounts of power (200w DC minimally). That’s better than any window unit that I know of.
  • Portability and adaptability to a wide variety of use cases is definitely better with the Wave 2 than a window unit.
  • ECO mode is worthless unless you’re in a dry desert environment without any humidity.
  • 200w DC seems to be the lower limit for the Wave 2 with the compressor running and on low fan speed.
  • Fan power draw appears to be ~10w per increment (10/20/30w DC for low/med/high)
  • Unmodified, I don’t see any reason to run the wave 2 in any mode but MAX or manual/high fan. I’ll have to test some more, but I suspect that any mode will throttle the compressor down as that same delta t is reached between inlet and outlet (or your set point). If that’s the case, you’re going to want the fan on high to mix the conditioned air with the room air as quickly as possible. Eco and sleep modes force you into low fan speed.
 
#2 ·
Some more thoughts on heater mode for the Wave 2:
  • I'm having a lot of buyer's remorse on the purchase because I didn't realize the 41F rating was for exterior temperatures, not interior. I thought as long as the unit inside your conditioned space was >41F you'd be able to run things, it turns out that isn't the case.
  • In hindsight, I should have realized 41F was the exterior temp rating... the unit moves heat from the exterior air by pulling outside air in, pulling heat from it (making it colder), and then blowing it back out. I believe Ecoflow artificially limited the compressor to keep the condenser coil at ~34F in order to prevent ice buildup.
  • Below 41F exterior temps, you should be able to use interior air as the source for your exhaust loop. As we learned in the background section though, that's going to cut your efficiency by quite a significant margin, probably in the 50-60% reduction range. That will still make things better than a space heater, but you'll maybe only get a COP of ~1.25 instead of 1.0 with a space heater? Much much worse than the ~2 COP I was hoping for.
  • If you can fit a residential condenser somewhere on your build, a residential mini split will easily give you significantly more performance down to extremely low temperatures (current state of the industry is down to -22F!) Those units at more reasonable temperatures have COPs in the 3+ range. If you're trying to go to electric only heat like I was, I think this is the only reasonable method to accomplish it.
  • With warranty ending modifications, I think there might be a way to move some thermocouples around and trick the ecoflow into taking its condenser side below 34F in heater mode. You would have to add some external logic to cycle a resistive heater to turn on and melt any ice, or reverse the unit on a timer and run in "A/C" mode to warm up the condenser and melt off any ice. I don't plan to do anything like that until next winter after my warranty is up.
 
#3 ·
Not moving the condensate from the evaporator to the condenser is a big design problem. Even if they had to put a cheap little diaphragm pump in it it’s needed to be effective in humid environments. The latent heat is just as important as temperature and it shows a lack of understanding by the designers. That and a bit of insulation on the supplied hoses would make a big difference.

Two hose ACs are a hard thing to make work correctly. The heat pump we use is basically a portable AC unit in a styrofoam box and it sits in holes cut in the floor of the van instead of having hoses. It works okay thanks to its insulated box but that’s a tough thing to pull off in a portable unit.
 
#4 ·
Not moving the condensate from the evaporator to the condenser is a big design problem. Even if they had to put a cheap little diaphragm pump in it it’s needed to be effective in humid environments. The latent heat is just as important as temperature and it shows a lack of understanding by the designers. That and a bit of insulation on the supplied hoses would make a big difference.

Two hose ACs are a hard thing to make work correctly. The heat pump we use is basically a portable AC unit in a styrofoam box and it sits in holes cut in the floor of the van instead of having hoses. It works okay thanks to its insulated box but that’s a tough thing to pull off in a portable unit.
Their actually is a diaphragm pump! It pumps condensate from the base to the top of the condenser heat exchanger. The only issue is that the base of the unit serves as the reservoir, and airflow on the conditioned side passes over that reservoir picking up moisture. Longer test periods would continue to reduce RH.
 
#5 ·
Ah, one more major gripe with the wave 2... The only way out of the box to power it via DC is if you buy the addon battery or another ecoflow power station. Ecoflow uses a proprietary xt150 with data comm that only activates the compressor if it is attached to one of their batteries. A DIY xt150 or giving it sufficient power through the Xt60 isn't enough to trick the unit.

I purchased the battery addon and plan to give it a constant 48v through the Xt60 to keep it powered via DC, but it's not consumer friendly to lock you into it this way. I'm sure it's great for their margins though.....

I saw someone had success on a wave 1 opening it up and shorting out some of the internal boards to trick the unit, but that's definitely warranty voiding.
 
#6 ·
Yes, to me one of the biggest minuses for the AIO is the proprietary interfaces. Hopefully right to repair legislation may help with this in the future but for now it is what it is and manufacturers find ever more devious ways of locking the customers in...
I have not looked into these much; I assume some manufacturers are better than others in this regard.
 
#7 ·
I came to these detailed test results via another comment you made, @asot550, on another thread. Thanks for all the nerdiness (that's a compliment by the way)!

That little Toshiba is not only cheap ($170) but isn't super power-hungry (at 460W).

If you don't mind a minor thread-hijack, I've always fantasized about taking apart such a unit and turning it into a hack mini-split. e.g. separate the condenser coils, compressor, and cooling fan (i.e., the "condenser stuff") from the cooling coils and relocate the "condenser stuff" outside of the van somewhere. Only the cooling coils and a smaller quieter user-supplied fan are inside the van.

Importantly for me, this will move the noisy stuff outside.

Recently, there have been vehicle-oriented smaller 12V mini-split AC units that aren't exorbitant in cost and they don't draw huge amounts of power. But "not exorbitant" is still a fair amount of money and I'm cheap. Also, they seem to be akin to Chinese diesel heaters (poor documentation and perhaps questionable parts) so I'm somewhat dubious about long-term reliability. Contrast this with window units like the Toshiba: cheap and manufacturers seem to have perfected the reliability.

I think I'm handy enough to take apart a window AC unit. I suspect I would have to slip an HVAC technician a couple hundred bucks under the table to extend the tubing (welding and dealing with the refrigerant issues).

Do you or anyone else think this would work?
 
#8 ·
Sure, anything is possible with enough time, money, and skills 😳

You wouldn't be able to turn it into a heat pump since you need a reversing valve, but I don't see why you couldn't split it open and relocate components.

Challenges you'll have to overcome include: extension of the refrigerant lines, brazing new copper tubes, figuring out if the compresser has any issues with a longer lineset (idk the answer to this), determining the appropriate amount of additional refrigerant to charge things with, a way to collect and dispose of condensed water from the interior, a way to pump water to your external radiator (the fans in window units have very low clearance to the base pan and actually pick up water from the base to spray over the condenser coils), and possibly other unknown unknowns?

Tbh, if going through all that trouble I think the only mod I can see being useful is figuring out a way to undermount the condenser and route your lineset through the floor. You'd still have the water issue, but lineset length is unlikely to be an issue. You could collect water inside and then use a little diaphragm pump to spray the collected water onto the rear of the condenser.

I think the time is better spent figuring a way to mount a window unit rather than re-engineering a split system.
 
#10 ·
Thanks for that. Originally I was thinking of undermounting the condenser stuff but having traversed a long dirt highway, I saw how much crud can accumulate underneath (it looks enough to kill an undermount AC system; I don't know how commercial units survive). My current fantasy is mounting it on one of the rear doors and having the cooling coils on the other side and thus lineset length wouldn't increase much.

Condensed water would just be collected and let drip out through a tube and out through the door but maybe I'll store it into a small tank (see below).

I wasn't aware of the role that condensed water from the cooling coils played in cooling the condenser coils. Makes sense. Maybe a tank to collect the cooling coil water supplemented by water from my freshwater tanks? Maybe some kind of pump (diaphram?) or simple gravity feed to put water into the airstream of the cooling fan? --It's all part of the fantasy!

PS: I'm lucky enough to have the time. I have the basic campervan building skills but will have to get an HVAC tech to step in for some of it.

PPS: or just bite the bullet and roll the dice on one of the new-fangled backpack AC units.
 
#9 ·
@travelvanvan check out this YouTube video detailing his trials and tribulations with his mini fridge. This guy has plenty of great content in the "hacking" space. If don't think I ever would've considered attempting an a/c mod if I hadn't seen this video... It's similar technology and seemed like a magic black box to me at one point. Now I know it's not as complex as I once originally thought:

 
#12 ·
What a cool guy! I prefer these vanlife videos to the, um, (melo)dramatic ones. :)

I'm not sure why he didn't learn from his previous drilling mistake. That interior fridge van could have been easily JB welded on (since he seems to have an ample supply of that substance).

Also, a bit better ventilation could have allowed his 1st fridge to last indefinitely (talk about cheap and reliable appliances that have been "perfected").

But, as you say, this is the same type of effort and skills needed to hack a mini-split from a window AC. :cool: :p
 
#15 ·
If you just cut a hole in the rear door you'd be able to mount a window unit without doing any of these mods. All you'd need is a platform and sufficient bracing/weather sealing. I'm pretty sure this is how most people do it in a van build.
For me, that'd look a little too ghetto and/or obvious. I will admit that my interior build is ghetto but outside, my van looks pretty normal (intentionally so as to avoid attention).

I've seen an exterior door hatch with a drawer slide to extend it from the back door or the side wall when needed, but pull it in while driving.
I have seen that (and also fantasized about that) but I think the skills to make it work well are similarly hard, perhaps harder than hacking the window AC. :unsure:
 
#16 ·
I have seen that (and also fantasized about that) but I think the skills to make it work well are similarly hard, perhaps harder than hacking the window AC. :unsure:
Doesn't seem too bad to me, just make a bottomless drawer for the a/c to sit on, attach sliders to the drawer, cut hole in van, slide out and done. You could make the hatch hingeable or a removable panel. Heck, buy a box that's intended for external tool storage and cut off the box and just use the flanged front. No one would be the wiser that it wasn't a tool box and it'd have a lock to prevent anyone from messing with it
 
#26 ·
Reviving an almost year old thread.
All good reads and so much info!
I have my Ecoflow Wave 2 in the back of a cabinet with two small drawers in front of it. The exhaust is going through the floor to the outside, the intake air is coming from the front of the van but still in the living space. I have the cooled or heated air coming from under the cabinet around the middle of the van. It seems to work great for me the way I have it setup. I didn't want a big unit on the roof.