They had a perfectly good generator and removed it.
I don't blame them at all if after nearly a year they had only used it about 3 hours -- other than for recommended generator exercise. However, in my opinion other decisions still leave some serious questions.
Firstly, if they only used generator 3 hours in a year, then they are not running their A/C very often without shore power. This being the case, then why add a second alternator? I like the concept of a second dedicated alternator a lot, but its main purpose is to allow for use of lots of power without hookups, with majority of that being for air conditioning. And if you need to run the van's engine that much for air conditioning, why not just run the van's A/C? Granted there are some anti-idling laws, but if you have to idle for second alternator anyway, then it may not circumvent this problem anyway.
Secondly, if you're not going to run A/C for hours at a time (requiring huge battery bank), then why even go to 400 Amp-hours of lithium? Half that would support an inverter to run microwave, coffee maker, fans, pumps, etc.
I like the concept of a second dedicated alternator and large lithium battery bank but only if it's large enough to run A/C at least through the night. If it's only good for three hours, just run vehicle A/C directly off engine, and charge smaller-size batteries from normal alternator. In this case I don't see a lot of merit in their middle-ground design.